Blog and Helpful Articles

Coding Cancers: A Common Charting Error

One of the most common provider charting errors occurs in the area of cancer diagnoses.  Practitioners routinely document and code cancers when the patient’s disease has been treated and is no longer evident.  For risk adjusted practices, this means the patient’s risk score – and the practice’s reimbursement – are inflated, which can lead to positive (which are a bad thing) audit findings and loss of capitation.

The coding guidelines for cancer state that “When the primary malignancy has been excised, no further treatment is directed to the site & there is no evidence of an existing malignancy,” the clinician must document ‘history of XYZ cancer’ and not the cancer diagnosis. [Source:  International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, 2020]  Cancer histories are coded from the Z85 category of codes (Personal history of malignant neoplasm) and are not weighted diagnoses under risk adjustment.  For MRA, it’s important to remember that funding losses are retroactive, so the impact of this error to the provider can be quite significant.

The rule of thumb for a cancer diagnosis is the presence of an active condition:  either one that is receiving treatment, or one that has been diagnosed via objective means and for which treatment is not pursued at the time (for any reason).

Read Full Post | Comments Off on Coding Cancers: A Common Charting Error

Tagged , , , , , , , , |

What We’re Reading – Home Health Turnover Worsens in 2019

Home health turnover, already higher than others businesses’, increased in 2019 when compared to 2018 rates, according to this article from Home Health Care News.  The hardest hit were home health aides and licensed practical nurses who saw 25.36% and 22.5% turnover, respectively. Nationally, the home care industry experienced 21.89% turnover across the board.  Interestingly, therapists had the lowest turnover at 12.52%.

For comparison purposes, the ADP Research Institute reported that 2019 turnover ranged from 2.0% for workers aged 65+ to 8.0% for those 25 and younger.

Read Full Post | Comments Off on What We’re Reading – Home Health Turnover Worsens in 2019

Tagged , , |

ICD-10-CM Changes for 2019 take effect on 10/1/18

The 2019 ICD-10-CM codes go into effect on October 1, 2018.  There are 473 changes (279 new ICD-10 codes, 51 deleted codes, and 143 revised codes) to know, understand and begin using in a short time.  This link contains a text file of the codes that were added, deleted and revised: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Publications/ICD10CM/2019/icd10cm_codes_addenda_2019.txt

This CDC page contains links to the electronic versions of the tabular and index sections and other helpful materials. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd10cm.htm

Read Full Post | Comments Off on ICD-10-CM Changes for 2019 take effect on 10/1/18

Tagged , , , |

Borderline Diagnoses

When a provider writes that a diagnosis is borderline, many coders will query the physician before coding.  However, the ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting states that borderline diagnoses are not considered uncertain and that there is no distinction between a borderline dx in an inpatient setting vs. an outpatient one.  This means that, unless the borderline diagnosis has its own code, you can code a borderline dx as the dx without querying the provider.

Examples:

  • Borderline diabetes is coded as pre-diabetes R73.03.
  • F21 is used for borderline or latent schizophrenia.

Of course, if you’re unsure, always make the query and await a response before coding.

Read Full Post | Comments Off on Borderline Diagnoses

Tagged , , , , |

Combination Codes

One interesting and time-saving feature of ICD-10-CM codes is the combination code.  Just like Burger King, McDonald’s and other fast food eateries, the world of coding has combos; the food-oriented ones save us money and the coding combos save us time.

The 2017 ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting state that “a combination code is a single code used to classify:

  • Two diagnoses, or
  • A diagnosis with an associated secondary process (manifestation)
  • A diagnosis with an associated complication”

We frequently see the separate and erroneous reporting of diagnoses contained in a combination code.  For example:  we have seen many instances when I25.119, Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unspecified angina pectoris was reported in addition to I20.9, Angina pectoris, unspecified.

Coders and providers should be mindful of the coding guidelines of combo codes, and report the second code only if instructed to do so. An example of this is E11.22, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease.  This combo code can be a little misleading because one might believe the kidney disease is included in the code.  However, the coding guideline states that the proper stage of CKD needs to be reported in addition to E11.22.

Combos are a great aspect of ICD-10 coding, but we must make sure to understand and apply the proper guidelines when using them.

Read Full Post | Comments Off on Combination Codes

Tagged , , , , , , , |

What We’re Reading – How to get your behavioral health codes right

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, (DSM-5, in medical parlance) is a handbook, if you will, to assist in making diagnostic judgments in cases of mental disorders.  The manual classifies conditions and provides diagnostic criteria in addition to medical codes from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9).   The DSM-5 released in 2013 includes both ICD-9-CM codes which are currently in use, and also features the relevant ICD-10-CM codes to prepare clinicians for the code-set transition later this year.

Although the behavioral health sector will not experience the vast increase in codes as, say, the field of orthopedics, mental health professionals still need to be familiar with the coding intricacies of these diagnoses and the changes posed by ICD-10. Not only is the actual code different in ICD-10 but the guidelines for coding certain diagnoses may have also changed. For example, ICD-10 includes combined codes for alcohol use and its related conditions such as hallucinations or withdrawal. Understanding the changes and proper education of clinicians and staff will minimize revenue disruptions.

http://www.govhealthit.com/blog/how-get-your-behavioral-health-codes-right

 

Read Full Post | Comments Off on What We’re Reading – How to get your behavioral health codes right

Tagged , , , , , , , |

What We’re Reading – Improve Clinical Documentation for ICD-10

Your administrative staff has probably hounded you for years to improve your documentation.  With the ICD-10 transition around the corner on October 1, 2014, clinician documentation will be more important than ever.  The code sets from have expanded from 14, 400 codes in ICD-9 to 70,000 codes in ICD-10.  The main reasons for such the huge increase are the specificity that will exist, in addition to specifying laterality and causality – just to name a few.

For example, for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, the number of codes grew from 69 ICD-9 codes to 239 ICD-10 codes.  For fractures, the number of codes went from 747 ICD-9 codes to 17,099 in ICD-10.

Get a jump on the transition by improving your documentation, and by reading this useful article. Your bottom line is only as good as your documentation.

Read Full Post | Comments Off on What We’re Reading – Improve Clinical Documentation for ICD-10

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , |

How is the ICD-10-CM Code Set Different from ICD-9-CM?

ICD-9 codes have between three and five characters, and with the exception of “V” and “E” codes, are exclusively numeric.  The fourth or fifth character is utilized for greater specificity and combinations of diagnoses are coded separately.  One example is diabetes with polyneuropathy which codes as 250.6x and 357.2.  It would be incorrect to code 250.0x for a diabetic patient with neurological manifestations.  In ICD-10-CM, this diagnosis would be coded as E08.42   Diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic polyneuropathy because the new code set introduces combination codes.  When a condition has associated symptoms and/or manifestations, ICD-10 has created one code to encompass several diagnoses.

That ICD-10 code certainly looks different from what we’ve become accustomed to, right?  That’s because ICD-10 makes substantial changes to the appearance of codes.  Although some of the general coding characteristics and categories (called chapters) remain the same, ICD-10 adds some interesting twists:

  • ICD-10 codes have between three and seven characters.
  • ICD-10 codes always begin with an alphabetic character followed by two numeric ones. All alpha characters, except the letter “u,” are included.  (Some codes that contain the letter “I” or “O” followed by a one or zero can appear a little strange, but after some practice, they will seem less so.)
  • The fifth and sixth characters are used for greater specificity, each one increasing the precision of the diagnosis.  Examples are Z67.20  Type B blood, Rh positive and Z67.21  Type B blood, Rh negative.  Some others include: O30.012 Twin pregnancy, monochorionic/monoamniotic, second trimester and L89.022  Pressure ulcer of left elbow, stage 2.
  • The seventh character is called an ‘extension’ and is used to identify the type of encounter or to expand on the nature of the condition (e.g., sequelae, complications, etc.)
  • ICD-10 requires the specification of laterality, which impacts the code selected.  The majority of ICD-10 codes are for the identification of a condition affecting the right, left or bilateral sides.  Examples are: H61.21  Impacted cerumen, right ear and H61.22  Impacted cerumen, left ear, as well as H61.23  Impacted cerumen, bilateral.
  • “X” marks the spot!  ICD-10 uses the placeholder character ‘x’ to occupy one or more spaces in codes where other characters don’t yet exist.  An example is M22.2x2  Patellofemoral disorders, left knee.  Note that laterality is also specified.

General Equivalence Mapping (GEMs) is a system of ‘translation’ that helps to convert an ICD-9 code into ICD-10.  However, GEMs are not considered crosswalks, and it’s dangerous to think they operate like, for example, an English-Spanish dictionary.  Keep in mind that ICD-10 has roughly four times more codes than ICD-9, many of which represent new conditions, more specific aspects of conditions, and combinations of diagnoses/symptoms.  It is best to understand and learn ICD-10’s format and practice using the code set than to rely on shortcuts that will definitely impact your organization’s productivity and profitability.

Read Full Post | Comments Off on How is the ICD-10-CM Code Set Different from ICD-9-CM?

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , |

What We’re Reading – OSHA Proposes Publishing Worker Injury Data

In 2012, nearly three million people were injured at work, according to The Bureau of Labor Statistics.  A proposed law, announced on November 7th , would require businesses with more than 20 employees to annually file their OSHA 300 form online and report illness and injury records for the calendar year.  OSHA currently requires businesses to complete the OSHA 300 form and post it in their workplace for 90 days so that employees can be informed of the number of workplaces injuries and illnesses.

Under the proposed law, businesses with more than 250 employees would be required to submit these records on a quarterly basis. The objective of this new law is to make the workplace safer with the collection and utilization of this timely submitted data.  To read more about this rule and to see if it will affect your business this article is a great opportunity.   Businesses with fewer than 20 employees will not be required to report the data.

This article provides additional detail.

Read Full Post | Comments Off on What We’re Reading – OSHA Proposes Publishing Worker Injury Data

Tagged , , , , , , , |

Outsourcing: The Key to Mission Control

During a recent dinner presentation, a hospital CEO from another state commented about her NFP’s strong profit orientation and how its sustainment necessitated a critical review of all processes.  The leadership team’s decision was to outsource several functions that are traditionally performed in-house, specifically laundry, environmental and maintenance services.  The CEO commented that she struggled with the decision because outsourcing runs counter to the traditional mentality of a community hospital.  “We had to remember that we’re not a linen company,” she explained. “That’s not one of our core competencies.  We’re a hospital. Providing excellent patient care is our mission.”

The strategic decision to outsource – or insource – is never easy.  It involves the systematic dissection of all the sequential processes and activities involved in the delivery of a product or service – analyzing the organization’s value chain – to identify how and where the organization brings value to its market.  The subsequent analysis should yield areas where costs can be lowered and/or value increased in the quest for a competitive advantage. Often the illusion of control balances perceived cost-effectiveness.  How much of your company’s resources (dollars, time, management) are devoted to activities that support the primary processes that meet your overall mission?  How much value does your organization (and its constituents) receive from that investment of resources?

Deciding whether to outsource doesn’t so much require thinking outside the box, but of blowing up the box and perhaps creating a triangle or a circle.  The exercise turns traditional business on its head in the search for better: better processes, better activities, better value, better efficiency, better quality and better margin.  Some issues to consider include:

  • Often the centralization and economies achieved by outsourcing firms – such as linen, billing or IT companies – allow them to provide your organization with superior, specialized services at a lower cost.  Just factoring personnel costs – the price tag to recruit, hire, train, supervise and compensate the provision of services – can be a huge persuader toward outsourcing.
  • In order to stay competitive with each other and with the organization’s in-sourcing tendencies, these specialized companies need a commitment to continuous education in their field. They have/should have access to the latest technology and stay current on the latest trends in their field, benefits that your organization receives at no additional cost.
  • Finally, contracts with external companies should contain provisions for accountability.  Here, an organization can build performance guidelines into its vendor relationship with less potential for variability than that which occurs in an employment relationship.

Given pressure to continue decreasing overall costs while achieving higher and higher quality standards, scrutinizing your internal value chain might warrant new consideration as you debate whether every single activity adds to your mission or distracts you from it.

Read Full Post | Comments Off on Outsourcing: The Key to Mission Control

Tagged , , , , , , |